• Arunkumar, M., Pfeuffer, C.U., & Giesen, C.G. (2023). Seeing is learning: Using anticipatory eye movements to explore contingency learning effects. MS in preparation.
• Giesen, C.G. (2024). "Siri, do you like Pokemon Go?" - Measuring human-like representations of virtual agents with the Implicit Association Test. MS submitted for publication.
• Giesen, C.G., ♦ Duderstadt, H., Richter, J., & Rothermund, K. (2024). Dissociating the roles of episodic response retrieval and contingency awareness in valence contingency learning. MS submitted for publication. Poster ESCoP 2023
• Giesen, C. G., ♦ Sommerfeld, J., & Rothermund, K. (2023). Children show intact reactive distractor inhibition, but impaired proactive spatial focusing against interfering distractors. MS in revision.
• Kubik, V., Thielmann, I., Koslowski, K., Giesen, C. G., Feld, G., & Schubert, A.-L. (2023). Attitudes toward Open Science practices among German psychologists. MS submitted for publication.

• [43*◊] Rudolph, M., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (in press). False contingency knowledge reverses the color-word contingency learning effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
• [42◊] Mocke, V., Giesen, C.G., Arunkumar, M., & Kunde, W. (in press). My turn or yours? Me-you distinction in feature-based action planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Link
• [41*◊] Güldenpenning, I., Böer, N., Kunde, W., Giesen, C.G., Rothermund, K., & Weigelt, M. (in press). Context-specific adaptation for head fakes in basketball: A study on player-specific fake-frequency schedules. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01977-2
• [40*◊] Arunkumar, M., Kunde, W., Mocke, V., Rothermund, K., & Giesen, C.G. (in press). Cling together, swing together? Assessing indirect retrieval of stimulus-response bindings for merely associated stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02525-0

• [39*] Frings, C., Beste, C., Benini, E., Möller, M., Dignath, D. Giesen, C.G., Hommel, B., Kiesel, A., Koch, I., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Mocke, V., Moeller, B., Münchau, A., Parmar, J., Pastötter, B., Pfister, R., Philipp, A.M., Qiu, R., Render, A., Rothermund, K., Schiltenwolf, M., & Schmalbrock, P. (2024). Consensus definitions of perception-action-integration in action control. Communications Psychology 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-023-00050-9
• [38◊] Eder, A.B., Krishna, A., Giesen, C.G., & Frings, C. (2024). Episodic binding of approach-avoidance-goals to stimuli: On the microgenesis of stimulus-motivated action tendencies to approach and avoid. Motivation Science, 10(1),52-62. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000318
• [37*◊] Arunkumar, M., Rothermund, K., Giesen, C.G. (2024). One link to link them all: A test of indirect response activation through stimulus-stimulus associations in contingency learning. Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000597

• [36*◊] Sprengholz, P., Schreckenbach, F., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2023). Guilty on the Go: Uncovering Concealed Information by Assessing Response Preparation Processes in a Go-Nogo-Paradigm. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.77819
• [35*] Kiesel, A., Fournier, L.R., Giesen, C.G., Mayr, S., & Frings, C. (2023). Core mechanisms in Action Control: Binding and Retrieval. Journal of Cognition, 6(1), https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.253
• [34*] Giesen, C.G., Janczyk, M., Dignath, D., Pfister, R., & Moeller, B. (2023). Das Puzzle im Kopf: Wie Wahrnehmungseindrücke und Handlungspläne entstehen. In-Mind Magazin. https://de.in-mind.org/article/das-puzzle-im-kopf-wie-wahrnehmungseindruecke-und-handlungsplaene-entstehen

• [33◊] Giesen, C.G. & Eder, A.E. (2022). Emotional arousal does not modulate stimulus-response binding and retrieval effects. Cognition & Emotion. https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Eder_Cognition_Emotion.pdf
• [32] Giesen, C. G. (2022). Wie Sie sehen, sehen Sie nichts: Warum wir einen pandemiebedingten Nachteilsausgleich für Nachwuchswissenschaftler:innen mit Kindern brauchen. In: S. Czerney, L. Eckert, & S. Martin (Hrsg.). Mutterschaft und Wissenschaft: Pandemie als Brennglas. Budrich Academic Press: Leverkusen. https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Corona_Nachteilsausgleich.pdf
• [31◊] Janczyk, M., Giesen, C.G., Moeller, B., Dignath, D., & Pfister, R. (2022). Event-coding in action and perception: Estimating effect sizes of common experimental designs. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01705-8
• [30*◊] Arunkumar, M., Rothermund, K., Kunde, W. & Giesen, C.G. (2022). Being in the know: The role of awareness and retrieval of transient stimulus-response bindings in selective contingency learning. Journal of Cognition, 5(1) 36, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.227
• [29◊] Giesen, C. G., ♦ Husken, L., & Schneider, D. (2022). Retrieval effects for observationally acquired stimulus-response bindings in participants with high and low autistic traits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(3), 191-201. https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Husken_Schneider_2022.pdf
• [28*◊] Giesen, C.G., & Rothermund, K. (2022). Reluctance against the machine: Retrieval of observational stimulus-response bindings in online settings when interacting with a human or computer partner. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 855–865. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02058-4
• [27*◊] Rothermund, K., ♦ Gollnick, N. & Giesen, C.G. (2022). Accounting for proportion congruency effects in the Stroop task in a confounded setup: Retrieval of stimulus-response episodes explains it all. Journal of Cognition, 5(1): 39, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.232

• [26*◊] Giesen, C. G., ♦ Nagel, L., ♦ Rudolph, M. & Rothermund, K. (2021). Smaller than ex-pected: Effects of imitative action regulation after experiencing social exclusion. Experimental Psychology, 0, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000516
• [25*◊] Giesen, C. G. & Frings, (2021). Not so social after all: Video-based acquisition of ob-servational stimulus-response bindings. Acta Psychologica, 217, 103330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103330
• [24] Wentura, D., Eder, A. B., Giesen, C.G., Pfeuffer, C., & Sauter, M. (2021). Eine Umfrage unter Studierenden – ein Appell an die Lehrenden. Kommentar der Sprechergruppe der Fachgruppe Allgemeine Psychologie zum Positionspapier „Replikationskrise, p-hacking und Open Science – eine Umfrage zu fragwürdigen Forschungspraktiken in studentischen Projekten und Impulse für die Lehre“. Psychologische Rundschau, 73(1), 38-40. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000572

• [23] Dobel, C., Giesen, C.G., Grigutsch, L.A., Kaufmann, J.M., Kovacs, G., Meissner, F., Rothermund, K., & Schweinberger, S. (2020). TeaP 2020 – Abstracts of the 62^nd Conference of Experimental Psychologists. Pabst Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.5176
• [22] Frings, C., Hommel, B., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Binding and retrieval in action control (BRAC): Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
• [21] Frings, C., Koch, I., Rothermund, K., Dignath, D., Giesen, C., Hommel, B., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Mayr, S., Moeller, B., Möller, M., Pfister, R., & Philipp, A. (2020). Merkmalsintegration und Abruf als wichtige Prozesse der Handlungssteuerung – eine Paradigmen-übergreifende Perspektive. Psychologische Rundschau, 71(1), 1-14.
• [20*◊] Giesen, C. G., Schmidt, J.R., & Rothermund, K. (2020). The law of recency: An episodic stimulus-response retrieval account of habit acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2927. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927
• [19*◊] Schmidt, J. R., Giesen, C. G., & Rothermund, K. (2020). Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(5), 739-761. doi: 10.1177/1747021820906397, https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Schmidt_Giesen_Rothermund2020.pdf
• [18] Wentura, D., Bermeitinger, C., Eder, A. B., Giesen, C.G., Michalkiewicz, M. (2020). Leises Glockenläuten – Kommentar der Fachgruppe Allgemeine Psychologie zum Positionspapier zur Lage der Entwicklungspsychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 71 (1), 44-46.

• [17] Bermeitinger, C., Eder, A.B., Giesen, C., Janczyk, M., Michalkiewicz, M., & Wentura, D. (2019). Ein „Ja!“ und ein paar Assoziatioen mit einem Hauch von Aber: Kommentar der Fachgruppe Allgemeine Psychologie zum Positionspapier zur Lage der Pädagogischen Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 70(2), 119-135.
• [16] Eder, A. B., Giesen, C., Michalkiewicz, M., & Wentura, D. (2019). Der psychologische Experte: Generalist oder Spezialist? Psychologische Rundschau, 70 (4), 259-278.
• [15] Wesslein, A., Moeller, B., Frings, C., & Giesen, C. (2019). Separating after-effects of target and distractor processing in the tactile sensory modality. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(3), 809-822. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-01655-7

• [14*] Giesen. C., ♦ Löhl, V., Rothermund, K., & Koranyi, N. (2018). Intimacy effects on action regulation: Retrieval of observationally acquired stimulus-response bindings in romantically involved interaction partners versus strangers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01369
• [13] Janczyk, M., Bermeitinger, C., Giesen, C., & Rummel, J. (2018). Wachsende Anforderun-gen an die wissenschaftliche Qualität erfordern eine immer größere Methodenkenntnis: Stellungnahme zum Positionspapier zur Rolle der Psychologischen Methodenlehre in Forschung und Lehre. Psychologische Rundschau, 69(4), 332-361.
• [12] Giesen, C., ♦ Weissmann, F., & Rothermund, K. (2018). Dissociating distractor inhibition and episodic retrieval processes in children: No evidence for developmental deficits. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 212-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.011, https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Weissmann_Rothermund_2018.pdf

• [11] Giesen. C., Rummel, J., Janczyk, M., & Bermeitinger, C. (2017). Qualifiziert – wofür und wozu eigentlich? Kommentar zu Rentzsch, K., Harzer, C., & Wolter, J. (2018). Stellungnahme zur Lage des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses in der Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 68(4), 274-276
• [10] Giesen, C., ♦ Scherdin, K., & Rothermund, K. (2017). Flexible goal imitation: Vicarious feedback influences stimulus-response binding by observation. Learning & Behavior, 45(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-016-0250-1

• [9] Giesen, C. & Rothermund, K. (2016). Multi-level response coding in stimulus-response bindings: Irrelevant distractors retrieve both semantic and motor response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(10), 1643-1656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000264

• [8] Giesen, C. & Rothermund, K. (2015). Adapting to Stimulus-Response Contingencies without noticing them. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(6), 1475-1481. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000122, https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Rothermund_2015.pdf
• [7] Giesen, C., ♦ Eberhard, M., & Rothermund, K. (2015). Loss of attentional inhibition in older adults – does it really exist? An experimental dissociation of inhibitory and memory retrieval processes. Psychology & Aging, 30(2), 220-231. doi: 10.1037/pag0000022, https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Eberhard_Rothermund_2015.pdf

• [6] Giesen, C., ♦ Herrmann, J., & Rothermund, K. (2014). Copying competitors? Interdependency modulates stimulus-based retrieval of observed responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1978-1991. doi: 10.1037/a0037614, https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Herrmann_Rothermund_2014.pdf
• [5] Giesen, C. & Moeller, B. (2014). Von kleinen Helfern im Alltag: Wie Umgebungsreize unser Handeln beeinflussen. Themenausgabe „Von der Basis zur Anwendung: Kognitionspsychologie und ihre Bedeutung für den Alltag. Teil 1“, In-Mind Magazine. https://de.in-mind.org/article/von-kleinen-helfern-im-alltag-wie-umgebungsreize-unser-handeln-beeinflussen
• [4] Giesen, C. & Rothermund, K. (2014a). Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses and previous targets: Experimental dissociations of distractor-response and distractor-target bindings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 645-659. doi: 10.1037/a0035278, https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Rothermund_2014a.pdf
• [3] Giesen, C. & Rothermund, K. (2014b). You better stop! Binding "stop" tags to irrelevant stimulus features. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(4), 809-832. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.834372, https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Rothermund_2014b.pdf

• [2] Giesen, C., Frings, C. & Rothermund, K. (2012). Differences in the strength of distractor inhibition do not affect distractor-response bindings. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0157-1

• [1] Giesen, C. & Rothermund, K. (2011). Affective matching moderates S-R binding. Cognition & Emotion, 25(2), 342-350. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.482765, https://github.com/cggiesen/cggiesen.github.io/Giesen_Rothermund_2011.pdf

Giesen, C. (2023). The cognitive basis of learning. Publikationsbasierte Habilitation, Universität Jena.

[Publikationen 8, 9, 10, 14, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28 und 29 sind Teil dieser publikationsbasierten Habilitation.]

Giesen, C. (2014). Mechanisms of automatic action regulation: New insights from the study of distractor integration effects. Publikationsbasierte Dissertation, Universität Jena.

[Publikationen 2, 3, 4 und 6 sind Teil dieser publikationsbasierten Dissertation.]

Giesen, C. (2009). Affective matching moderates binding processes. Evidence from the negative priming paradigm. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Jena.